Calm, Forward, Straight

Calm, Forward, Straight

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

By their fruits you will know them...

Face Behind the Vertical
A "modern" deviation from the classical ideal.
Part Three

by Erik F. Herbermann

Modern trainers claim that horses "give" better in their backs when they are ridden behind the vertical. But as we have seen earlier form Fillis and Baucher, the only advantage to this way of working is that the horse cannot as easily resist the rider. Now, our instant gut reaction might be that this is exactly what we want, but for true horsemanship, this is only "Fool's Gold," because where poor riding makes the horse unable to resist, good riding strives to give the horse no reason to resist.

Not only does the artificial "face behind the vertical" way of ridding the horse of its ability to resist not lead to a true state of "lack of resistance" (which can only originate from honest, forward-going work), but it actually blocks off the very avenue though which such correct influences might come into play at all. This blockage occurs on both the psychological and physical planes.

Psychologically: if we rob the horse of its "say" by shutting off its ability to resist, we inevitably also shut off its willingness to contribute, and with that evaporates the potential for achieving the "playful ease and beauty" of the performances. Those coveted fruits of riding, which can only unfold from an honest, trusting, and harmonious partnership have thus been forfeited. The dialogue has ceased. Only the rider's willful monologue remains.

Physically and technically: by riding the horse behind the vertical, with curled-up "empty" necks, we rob them of the proper use of the major locomotive muscles in their backs, which are anchored in the neck. The hind legs are hindered from "jumping freely into the poll," which would ordinarily cause the horse to carry its head with the poll as the highest point. And since the energy is therefore not properly focused out of the hindquarters and reaching forward to the bit, the horses are not honestly stretched in their spines. The connection between the hindquarter and the bit, which is indispensable to correct work, has not been solidly established. Instead of beiong supple and energetic, such a hindquarter is restricted and stiff and cannot develop the appropriate carrying and thrusting energy that leads to correct balance.

The correct balance in the horse should be "held" by the perpendicular balance of the rider's spine, resting partially on the crotch and mainly on both seat bones. If, however, it is held with the hands, such as it often is when the horse is ridden with its face behind the vertical, either the horses barge like locomotives against the bit, up to which they have been forced, or they are artificially light in hand (behind the bit) and are not truly going forward. This is one of the central reasons for the artificial quality of the gaits we so often see.

For our horsemanship to be valid, its critical that we tirelessly strive to maintain the highest quality of the gaits. This is reflected in the absolute purity of the footfall, which is the medium ---the very lifeblood--- of good horsemanship. It is therefore imperative for us to understand the inseparable correlation between the head and neck position of the horse, how this position has been achieved, and the direct effects these elements have on the quality of the gaits.

In a well known book of ethical guidelines, the Master says, "By their fruits will you know them. Can people pick grapes from thorns, or figs from thistles?" We can rightfully draw an analogy and conclude that good work produces pure, beautiful gaits. Poor work produces warping and distortions. So judging by its unmistakable ruinous effects on the gaits, "face behind the vertical" should have no part in our horsemanship if we are at all sincere about following the classical way. "Face behind the vertical" is a tip-of-the-iceberg phenomenon in which the basic mathematics is wrong --- how can the equations built on it help but fail?

4 comments:

Carol said...

Great stuff. Thanks for posting about this. I subscribe to dressage clinic.com training videos and it took me weeks to come across a horse who isn't behind the vertical. It's become accepted and expected and I wonder if there aren't lots of people who don't even realize it isn't how it should be.

Grey Horse Matters said...

Great article and of course he's absolutely right about everything.

There is no beauty in a horse who is forced into the "face behind the vertical" position. There can be no purity of gaits and no joy for the horse who is abused in this way.

When he says, "the only advantage to this way of working is that the horse cannot as easily resist the rider", I'm thinking of the Anky's of the world.

They refuse to take the time to train a horse properly. All these riders insist on riding huge warmbloods that they can't control without years of sensitive proper training. So they ride around the ring muscling the horse into doing the movements which don't flow or use the horses hind end or back properly. Still they get rewarded with ribbons,endorsements and money.

My Dutch Warmblood was 17-2 hands and he was a hand full in his younger years. It took many years of training to get him where he needed to be and let him learn how to use himself properly. If shortcuts are taken the horse and rider suffer and so does the sport.

End of rant.

Annette said...

This is so true. I think the problem is that people don't want to take the time to develop relaxed work. So many people want to move up the levels lickity split. I've spent a year getting Jackson to accept the bit and work in a good relaxed frame. Just this month he finally got it. But the time is worth it. He is so happy, so relaxed and so correct. I think the question is: do you want to be a partner or a dictator with your horse. I prefer partnership myself.

jme said...

i love that he mentions the psychological as well as the physical 'blockage' created in the horse by this method. i think that's an important point to stress - this isn't just about the physical effects related to comfort, development and movement. there is a very real (and very negative) psychological motivation and result behind this method. i've likened this forced BTV positioning to what has been euphemistically called 'stress positions' and consider this torture, not training. the question every rider has to ask is whether we want our horses to be our slaves... or our partners?

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...